Estimated reading time: 3 minutes
In many architectural practices, Excel remains the default tool for managing drawing issue registers. But for a task that is repetitive, admin-heavy, and compliance-sensitive, is it really fit for purpose? Continuing to use spreadsheets is a bit like driving a manual car in city traffic - inefficient, error-prone, and ultimately frustrating. Purpose-built platforms like Share&Log offer a better alternative: they reduce admin burden, enhance traceability, and help you stay compliant—all while saving valuable time.
The timing tests below are based on carrying out the actual task of logging a single drawing issue register using both the traditional Excel method and the Share&Log digital solution. These timings were measured across multiple real-world scenarios to provide accurate and practical comparisons between the two approaches. We have estimated that an average drawing issue includes approximately 12 drawings. This figure is based on calculations from a mid-sized architectural practice.
The chart illustrates the average amount of time an architectural practice typically spends managing drawing issue registers, comparing traditional Excel workflows with Share&Log. The analysis considers project size and is based on a hypothetical medium-sized practice completing 40 projects per year, split as follows:
When calculated across the annual project mix, this adds up to 28.5 person-days per year spent solely on managing registers manually using Excel. That is more than a full month of full-time staff time - time that could be better spent on design, coordination, or project delivery.
Using Share&Log reduces this total to just 10 days, saving 18 working days per year.
In other words, switching to Share&Log saves almost 3 weeks of work annually - per practice.
This is a striking example of how leveraging technology can deliver real return on investment - while also supporting QA / ISO compliances of your business.